<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bell of Lost Souls - Latest Comments in 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://belloflostsouls.disqus.com/</link><description>Bell of Lost Souls is a community and news site for tabletop games, RPGs and pop culture.  All the Warhammer, D&amp;D,  Star Wars and geeky entertainment news and opinion articles you can handle.</description><atom:link href="https://belloflostsouls.disqus.com/40k_sneak_peek_new_leman_russ_demolisher/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:03:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10825642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone think it just... isn't finished yet for massed production; there doesn't seem to be enough detail on the new hull parts (hand holds, head lights, etc), it's just flat panels? &lt;br&gt;Where's the dozer blade, are they getting new ones (a huge chunky vindicator like one would be awesome)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do like the new 'Ryza' style turret but i am very disappointed they used the ugly old design for the demolisher barrel, the forge world one (as an example) is so much better. All in all, like the new hellhound, i think the new demolisher is very cool, i know i'll be buying a few!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">helline9</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:03:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10571398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've seen alot of comments aout the sub standard assembly of the ne IG tanks by GW. Here is my theory: Its a marketing thing. GW's bottom line is sales, and perfect modeling/painting can be intimidating for new customers (what begginer hasn't been demoralized when they look at thier first attempt ccompared to the GW studio pics?) If the team at GW shows that there are flaws in thier work, then maybe the new customer wont feel so bad. Happy new customers turn into returning customers, and returnig customers means more sales.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:29:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10494555</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The M10 is not a good armour vehicle to compare the demolisher to, as the M10 is a long-barrelled, high-velocity AT gun.&lt;br&gt;The Brummbar or Sturmtiger are closer (although unturreted).&lt;br&gt;The M8 has a similar look, small turret (but lighter gun).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The demolisher probably has a pretty short breach, as it fires a two-stage shell (and thus has little recoil).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Old_Paladin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:33:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10473249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its a MULTI MODEL KIT.  GW never does that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OH NOES!!  WHAT ABOUT THE NEW STORM LORD etc...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Idiots I swear.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Commisar_Xi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:04:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10428574</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm likin' it but...&lt;br&gt;Can you still buy a Leman Russ Exterminator for Space Wolves?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10407413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well it worked for me!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any more gems like that one?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zapp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:01:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10405359</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The IG must love to eat, because that is the largest Sundries box ever, which would mean the turret is still too SMALL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How big is the round, and where does the breach go (it does have a hatch after all)?&lt;br&gt;Yes, I know if it was realistic, the barrels of the weapons would be to flimsy and prone to breaking, etc., but seriously, the turret is still too small for that big of a main gun.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;M10 turret interior;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tankdestroyersociety.com/images/M10_Driver_08.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tankdestroyersociety.com/images/M10_Driver_08.jpg"&gt;http://www.tankdestroyersoc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For scale purposes;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.asphm.com/projets/projet_m10_tank_destroyer/projet_m10_tank_destroyer.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.asphm.com/projets/projet_m10_tank_destroyer/projet_m10_tank_destroyer.html"&gt;http://www.asphm.com/projet...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rexscarlet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:48:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10404335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;its an in-joke that i adapted for the masses... :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TSINI</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10404249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ahhhh funny.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I bet you thought of that one ages ago and wrote it down in your special book to use later, didn't you?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zapp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:02:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10403986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it was more a comment on the flamer is the old style in that it is two nozzles like the old SM heavy flamer. Unlike the newer style of flamer which is the one with the single nozzle with the pilot light.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It makes less sense to keep the old one now that they have updated the main flamer style of the hellhound.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oh well, looks like I have found a use for any left over heavy flamer bits from the command squad box.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bucho</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:52:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10403335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That went wrong. Try again: &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/ryzalr.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/ryzalr.htm"&gt;http://www.forgeworld.co.uk...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;The shape just doesn't make sense otherwise. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PenelopeTheWonderPony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:24:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10403327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's with all the hating?! I actually really, really like this- much better than the current stupidly narrow turret! Also it looks to me as if this turret is made for the basic Russ, then has a Demolisher cannon fitted- look at that raised bump on the top of the turret, just behind the mantlet for the Demolisher cannon. If looks like it should have a Battlecannon housed in it, like on this Forgeworld turret:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PenelopeTheWonderPony</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:24:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10401263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't like the current hull flamers very much, they lack a lot of detail. I still got the old ones from chimera kits which you had to glue on the sawed off heavy bolter mounts.&lt;br&gt;Those have comparatively much more detail and look really nice. Never used one from the new sprues, just took the old ones.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Catzilla</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:58:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10399380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It doesn't take a pro to clean up mold lines with an xacto knife, and get pieces to line up correctly. Look closely at the turrets on the new hellhounds and russes to see what I am talking about. This is a professional company with professional modellers and painters on staff, there is no reason to showcase shoddy work, especially in a sneak preview photo like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evilamericorp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:58:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10395236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it looks boring. I'm disappointed with this and the new Hellhound.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lord_Summerisle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10393618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;apart from the base of the hull, the body is the same&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;quite like the new turret, although i hope its not copied onto the standard battle tank / vanquisher / exterminator / eradicator, i'd prefer the current (original) one for those&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;not loving the old style flamer, but then if theywant them this long, all we have to do is modify some ones left over from the cadian/catachan troops sprues, make them about the same length :) theyd look much better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TSINI</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10393372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;they don't show up on brail computer screens....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TSINI</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:13:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10393307</link><description>&lt;p&gt;its a hull heavy flamer, they just didnt bother updating it to the new style for an unknown reason lol (maybe theyre trying to avoid updating tank heavy flamers so they don't get confused by "little timmy" as being inferno cannons or redeemer flamers. their own fault for not making the bigger flamer nozzles insanely bigger...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TSINI</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:11:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10393186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;classic mousemuffin again (the guy who's doing the clockwork necrons and marines panther)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;what a legend&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TSINI</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:07:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10392828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think they've over extended the heavy bolters on the side and the heavy flamer but apart from that it looks pretty good. Just need to see what the variants will be like seeing as I'm going take a punisher and an executioner. Also it will be fun to muck around with those spares ( heavy bolters, plasma cannons and multi-meltas? hehe)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">UltramarineFan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10392185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I dont like the look of the new chassis looks, less.. Umm cool I cant really think of a good description it just dont look right (N)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">4thCompanyMasterCorvus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:35:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10391957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;EXACTLY!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To lazy to add it to the "new" sprues...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Exactly...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rexscarlet</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10390898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like it, kinda looks like the turret from a Centurion tank (although this one is more modernised). I seriously hope these become available online as a seperate bitz sprue, I can see myself making lots of barrel changes from my old russes and my scratch built vanquisher.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kirko303</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10390535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;very much liking the look of the new kit, apart from th old style flamer on the front, they should really update it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blackmane</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:45:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 40K SNEAK PEEK: New Leman Russ Demolisher</title><link>http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/06/40k-sneak-peek-new-leman-russ.html#comment-10389742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A) It's the heavy flamer from the Vehicle sprue (the one with the 'dozer blade).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cnrr</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>