Bell of Lost Souls - Latest Comments in RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

lala — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:15:56 -0000

ffffffffdfdfsdfd wikerd

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

GarethUK — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:02:06 -0000

incase you guys havent seen them, the new ork stuff for january is in the 2009 catalogue.

Also the UK Games Workshops have all recieved samples of battlewagons, stormboys, grots, nobz and Zagstrukk so ask you local guys and they will probably be able to show you whats there.

Ive just built the stormboys in the Staines store and we are gonna be building the battlewagonm this week.

Aslo there is nothing for WFB or 40k in April.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Ulrik — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:59:18 -0000

Me personally, I don't mind waiting for my new SW codex. Its not like I'm getting tired of my army getting crap from store managers and other gamers.......

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Dave the Second — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:38:28 -0000

I agree with Havik110. Take mandrakes as an example: The hidden deployment rule rocks and so does the cover-save bonus but when they get into assault... then what? They get torn apart by everything thats not a gretchin or a scarab swarm.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

mav — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:55:25 -0000

glad dark eldar being redone concentrate bumming eldar 2 much its not fare game

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Matt Wadey — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:16:35 -0000

cool any idea when the 2nd wave of Marines is released

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Evan — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:01:30 -0000

Chaos Daemons did sneak in out of nowhere earlier this year... I don't think it's crazy to believe more Chaos is coming. Especially when the rumored "other" chaos books have been mentioned for a long time now.

I can see GW giving prioritized attention to Chaos, they are just a spin off of their flagship Marines anyways ... right?

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

albertsevil — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:46:53 -0000

Really? That would be brilliant, but i can't see it myself. There seems to be a rather full schedule for 2009 already, plus it has been previously mentioned on BOLS that all other 40K codicies should be finished first.
Don't know quite what to think at the moment, but after we had a new Chaos codex in late 2007, i doubt that they'd give us another so soon (even with the changes of 5th). It's a shame but i reckon 2010 will be more likely.
Sorry if i seem to have shot you down but that's my opinion - if you do have evidence to support an 09 release than i apologise and will get rather excited.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

sun tzu — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:26:55 -0000

There is alot of talk about a "Codex chaos legion" to cover the origanal 9 legions that rebeled in the HH. GW have as good as confirmed they are working on it and have strongly hinted about a summer 09 release.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Havik110 — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:11:11 -0000

Look at the codex and the copyright date on it. it will say 1998.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Sean — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:59:49 -0000

I feel your pain... but please stop making up numbers to prove a point. You are making DE players look bad.
DE were introduces as an army with 3rd ed. 3rd ed came out, i believe, in 2000 or 2001. The 2nd edition of the DE codex was released in 2002.
If I follow the math that you have used, I am lead to belive that 1998 to 2008 equals 20 years?

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Daddy — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:34:38 -0000

except for the fact that the oldest fantasy army rulesbook left would be tomb kings and we sit and wait.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

KaCee — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:53:28 -0000

It wasn't my intention. I play wolvesmyself. I own nearly 10,000 points of them, including the old Bjorn (when the box actually said Bjorn and wasnt a space wolve dreadnaught, and Njal Stormcaller, along with most of the other old codex names we have lost.

I want the new wolves, I just dont see them soon.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

faultie — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:28:26 -0000

Thanks for ruining my hopes, KaCee. After you're done with your daily puppy-kicking, maybe you could go push my grandmother down a flight of stairs.

</sarcasm>
:)

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

KaCee — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:19:06 -0000

Dont count on it. When asked a direct question about the Wolves at Games Day, Gav actually gave a direct answer (for once).

He said "12-18 months".

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Havik110 — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:44:16 -0000

I have the 2nd DE codex. The only thing changed from the 1st codex and 2nd
was vehicle upgrades and heroes and wych weapons. It is from 1998. They
have had enough time. We need it more than the necrons. Finish our codex
do 1 or 2 models and release them slowly like every codex they are doing
now. We need to be faster then every other army, hit harder and die faster
then everyone else. the reason they have done so porly in sales is directly
due to GW abandoning them for 20 years. We dont even get apocholips crap.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

John Doa — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:38:38 -0000

I'd rather wait a little longer knowing that the codex is going to be done right than them put it out when it wasn't ready. I mean, look at the Chaos codex, they could've done with abit more time spent on that... or just not give it to Gav Thorpe to write.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

John Lambshead — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:06:00 -0000

It s Latin for 'Let the buyer beware"'.

Used in English it means that a purchaser of goods should check them before parting with any money - alternative "sold as seen".

In this context, it means that this is only a rumour that may not be true, or entirely true so you should 'take it with a pinch of salt'.

Hope that helps,
John

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

the shiner — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:23:27 -0000

wtf does caveat or standard caveats or caveat emptor means????

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

12 year old lizard men fanatic — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:18:42 -0000

all hail lizardmen creators of all, the followers of the old ones and slann! yipee more dinoes to play with

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Steve — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 06:20:24 -0000

Not quite- a weapon destroyed just take 1 attack a turn off the gauss arc... so 6WD will stop it from firing but there's nothing that says its then destroyed and can't suffer a 7th weapon destroyed as normal.

But even assuming it can be weapon destroyed it'll still take 8 'damage' results to destroy the darn thing.. or about 36 turns with 2 TH :'(

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

UltramarineFan — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:03:17 -0000

You should definetively do that! Ironclads are so cool, absolutely amazing! and when mounted in a drop pod MWHAHAHAHA!

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

UltramarineFan — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:01:02 -0000

It's true, monoliths are so hard to destroy it's just not true. Though nest time I face them I' m going to use all the THs I have......2! oh well lets hope I get lucky with six S8 attacks. btw you don't need to penetrate getting enough immobilised and weapon destroyed results will do.

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

Doug — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:56:59 -0000

Care to sell me any of those old squat minis?

Re: RUMORS: WFB/40k Schedules

TheMacDiesel — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:51:47 -0000

At Grand Tournament Chicago GW showed pictures of the second wave Orks... my cell phone camera didn't take any pics worth post, but they did show pics of three Ork special characters: Boss Zagstruck (in a post that is clearly inspired by the Codex art,) Boss Snikrot, and Kaptin Badrukk -- a nice update of the old 1st/2nd edition flash gitz nob model. Dave Taylor also mentioned that the Nobz sprues would have bitz to upgrade Nobz to Flash Gtiz (no pictures shown.)